Measurement

Peak and current are always published together. Either number alone is a different claim, and the flattering one is the claim that sells followers a record that never existed.

What is recorded, and when

A call is journalled the moment it appears, with the price at that moment captured as its entry. That timing is the whole basis of the system's honesty: a price taken later would let a source's record be shaped by hindsight, and a price taken from a chart today would invent one entirely. Where an entry price genuinely cannot be established, the call is excluded from the statistics rather than assigned a convenient one.

Outcomes, not averages

Results are grouped by what actually happened: how many calls never recovered half their entry, how many reached fifty percent, two times, five times or better — over whatever window the reader chooses. A distribution shows the shape of a source's trading. An average hides it, because one outlier can carry a hundred failures.

Not enough history

A new community says so rather than showing zeros. There is a minimum sample before statistics are presented at all, and below it the interface reports what it has — tracking since a date, with a count — instead of implying a record that has not been earned yet. Unknown is never rendered as zero anywhere in the product.

Why it cannot be gamed easily

Only one channel per community is monitored and it is chosen deliberately by the owner. Repeat calls on the same token are subject to a cooldown. Duplicated messages are rejected. Editing or deleting a message cannot quietly remove a measured result from the record after the fact. And because every call is priced when it lands, a source cannot wait to see which ones worked before deciding what counts.